Perception systems and methods for identifying and processing a variety of objects

ABSTRACT

A drop perception system is disclosed that includes an open housing structure having an internal volume, an open top and an open bottom, and a plurality of perception units positioned to capture perception data within the internal volume at a plurality of locations between the open top and the open bottom of the open housing.

PRIORITY

The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/269,640 filed Dec. 18, 2015, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND

The invention generally relates to perception systems, and relates in particular to scanning systems for use in connection with robotic and other sortation systems that are intended to be used in dynamic environments requiring the robotic or other sortation system to accommodate processing a variety of types of objects.

For example many order fulfillment operations achieve high efficiency by employing a process called wave picking. In wave picking, orders are picked from warehouse shelves and placed at locations (e.g., into bins) containing multiple orders that are sorted downstream. At the sorting stage individual articles are identified, and multi-article orders are consolidated, for example into a single bin or shelf location, so that they may be packed and then shipped to customers. The process of sorting these articles has traditionally been done by hand. A human sorter picks an article from an incoming bin, finds a barcode on the object, scans the barcode with a handheld barcode scanner, determines from the scanned barcode the appropriate bin or shelf location for the article, and then places the article in the so-determined bin or shelf location where all articles for that order have been defined to belong. Automated systems for order fulfillment have also been proposed. See for example, U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2014/0244026, which discloses the use of a robotic arm together with an arcuate structure that is movable to within reach of the robotic arm.

Other ways of identifying items by code scanning either require manual processing, or require that the code location be controlled or constrained so that a fixed or robot-held code scanner (e.g., barcode scanner) can reliably detect it. Manually operated barcode scanners are generally either fixed or handheld systems. With fixed systems, such as those used at point-of-sale systems, the operator holds the article and places it in front of the scanner so that the barcode faces the scanning device's sensors, and the scanner, which scans continuously and decodes any barcodes that it can detect. If the article is not immediately detected, the person holding the article typically needs to vary the position or rotation of the object in front of the fixed scanner, so as to make the barcode more visible to the scanner. For handheld systems, the person operating the scanner looks for the barcode on the article, and then holds the scanner so that the article's barcode is visible to the scanner, and then presses a button on the handheld scanner to initiate a scan of the barcode.

Automatic barcode scanners are similarly either fixed or hand-held systems, and the same principles apply. In the case of barcode scanners typically used in industrial applications, the possible positions of barcodes must be tightly controlled so that they are visible to the one or more scanners. For example, one or more barcode scanners may be placed in fixed locations relative to a conveyor so that they can scan items, typically boxes, as they pass by scanners. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,495,097. In these installations the range of placement of the barcodes is comparatively limited as the barcodes are on labels affixed to one of four sides or top or bottom (e.g., if upside down) of a box, which can be presented using simple mechanical means, at orientations optimal for scanning.

In all of these cases, the systems employ sensors, cameras or laser reflectivity sensors, as well as software to detect barcodes and decode them. These methods have inherent limitations that include the range of distances of orientations relative to the detection system, over which they are able to reliably scan barcodes. Firstly, the barcode must be facing the scanner; secondly the range to the barcode must be such that individual elements can be reliably distinguished; and, thirdly, the tilt and skew of the barcode must be such that individual elements can be reliably distinguished. The types of sensors employed, and the robustness of the software detection and decoding schemes determine these performance parameters.

There remains a need, therefore, for an object identification system for robotic and other sortation systems that is able to accommodate the automated identification and processing of a variety of objects in a variety of orientations.

SUMMARY

In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides a drop perception system that includes an open housing structure having an internal volume, an open top and an open bottom, and a plurality of perception units positioned to capture perception data within the internal volume at a plurality of locations between the open top and the open bottom of the open housing.

In accordance with another embodiment, the invention provides a perception system for assisting in identifying an object, the perception system including a plurality of perception units that are each positioned to be directed toward different portions of an object path that an object takes as the object travels through the perception system without assistance by any mechanical conveyance system in contact with the object.

In accordance with a further embodiment, the invention provides a drop perception system for identifying an object, the drop perception system including a plurality of perception units that are each positioned to be directed toward different portions of an object path that an object may take as the object falls through the drop perception system, and each perception unit is engageable to provide perception data regarding the object.

In accordance with a further embodiment, the invention provides a method of sorting objects. The method includes the steps of dropping an object into a perception system that includes a plurality of perception units that are each positioned to be directed toward different portions of a path that the object may take as the object falls through the perception unit, and engaging the perception units to capture perception data associated with the object.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The following description may be further understood with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

FIG. 1 shows an illustrative isometric diagrammatic view of a perception system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 shows a front illustrative diagrammatic view of the perception system of FIG. 1;

FIG. 3 shows an illustrative isometric diagrammatic view of a perception system in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 shows an illustrative elevated rear view of the perception system of FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 shows an illustrative front view of the perception system of FIG. 3 taken along line 5-5 thereof;

FIG. 6 shows an illustrative side view of the perception system of FIG. 3 taken along line 6-6 thereof;

FIG. 7 shows an illustrative top view of the perception system of FIG. 3;

FIG. 8 shows an illustrative linear diagrammatic view of a portion of the inside of the perception system of FIG. 3;

FIGS. 9A-9H show illustrative linear diagrammatic views of the inside of the perception system of FIG. 3 showing different stages of illumination and perception data captures;

FIGS. 10A-10C show illustrative views of a flowchart showing an operation of the perception system of FIG. 3;

FIG. 11 shows an illustrative diagrammatic view of a lighting system used in the perception system of FIG. 3;

FIG. 12 shows an illustrative diagrammatic view of an image capture system used in the perception system of FIG. 3;

FIGS. 13A-13R show illustrative views of images taken by the perception system of FIG. 3 (FIGS. 13A, 13C, 13E, 13G, 13I, 13K, 13M, 13O, 13Q) as well as associated processed image data (FIGS. 13B, 13D, 13F, 13H, 13J, 13L, 13N, 13P, 13R);

FIG. 14 shows a sortation system including the perception system of FIG. 3 together with infeed devices and a sortation device;

FIG. 15 shows a sortation system including the perception system of FIG. 3 together with an item position/orientation adjustment device including an underside perception unit, as well as a sortation device; and

FIG. 16 shows a sortation system including the perception system of FIG. 3 together with an item position/orientation adjustment device including a fan, as well as a sortation device.

The drawings are shown for illustrative purposes only.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In accordance with an embodiment, the invention provides a novel object perception system for the purposes of automatically sorting individual objects in a set. In applications such as order fulfillment, articles or goods are collected into heterogeneous sets and need to be sorted. Individual objects need to be identified and then routed to object-specific locations. The described systems reliably automate the identification of such objects by employing automated scanners. The scanners look for a variety of codes such as indicia (e.g., barcodes, radio frequency tags, Stock Keeping Unit (SKU), Universal Product Code (UPC), Digimarc DWCode, etc.).

Operating in conjunction with a robotic pick and place system, systems in accordance with various embodiments of the invention automate part of the sorting process, in particular the step of identifying picked objects. Instead of a person picking the object from a bin for example, a robotic arm picks an article from a bin. The object is passed in front of a plurality of barcode scanners, and then, having obtained identification codes for the object, the object is then routed to the appropriate bin or shelf location. Since barcode scanners employ cameras or lasers to scan 1D or 2D symbologies printed on labels affixed to objects, the barcodes must be visible to the scanner's sensors for successful scanning in order to automatically identifying items in a heterogeneous stream of arbitrary objects, as in a jumbled set of objects found in a bin.

Whereas fixed industrial scanners require that the object's barcode be situated so that its barcode is visible to a scanner, the robotic arm of the present invention may pick an object out of a heterogeneous collection of objects where the barcode is not visible and drop the object into a perception system of the present invention. In other embodiments, the system may provide that objects are dropped into the perception system by providing a feed conveyor positioned above the perception system, and providing that objects are singulated on the conveyor. The result is an automated barcode scanning system for arbitrary objects in a heterogeneous stream of objects that can be used to accurately and reliably identify the objects.

Sorting for order fulfillment is one application for automatically identifying objects from a heterogeneous object stream. Barcode scanners have a wide variety of further uses including identifying the stock keeping unit of an article, or tracking parcels. The described systems may have many uses in the automatic identification and sortation of objects.

In accordance with various embodiments, therefore, the invention provides a method for determining the identity of an object from a collection of objects, as well as a method for scanning the barcode of an object employing one or more scanners and a sortation system for differently processing different objects. The invention further provides a method for determining the placement of fixed barcode scanners so as to maximize the probability of successfully scanning an object selected by a robot end-effector in accordance with certain embodiments, as well as a method for determining whether multiple objects are dropped into the scanner at the same time.

An important aspect is the ability to identify via barcode or other visual markings of objects by employing a perception system into which objects may be dropped. Automated scanning systems would be unable to see barcodes on objects that are presented in a way that their barcodes are not exposed or visible. As shown in FIG. 1, a perception system 10 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention may include an open housing 12 through which an object may be dropped. Inside the hosing is a plurality of perception units 14 (e.g., eight or twelve) that are generally directed toward the interior of the housing from many different directions. The housing may also include a plurality of lights 16 that are timed to provide bright dispersed light at the times that each of the perception units 14 take pictures of a falling object 18. Each perception unit 14 may, for example, take a hundred images while an object is falling from directions as indicated at A in FIG. 2. The detection units 14 may be connected to a processing system 20 that reviews each of the images in search of a unique identifier such as a barcode. The perception units may include cameras (e.g., 2D or 3D) or scanners (e.g., a laser reflectivity scanner other type of barcode reader (such as 1D or 2D barcode scanners, or radio frequency ID scanner), and the processing system 20 may include the associated software to process the perception data. Some cameras are directed horizontally, while others are directed upward, and some are directed downward as shown. The system 10 may also include entry detection units that provide a curtain of, e.g., infrared illumination by a source 22 across the opening as well as a detector 24 for detecting a break in the illumination. The detection units therefor provide a signal that an object has entered the drop scanner 10.

The perception system may be used in certain embodiments, with a robotic system that may include a robotic arm equipped with sensors and computing, that when combined is assumed herein to exhibit the following capabilities: (a) it is able to pick objects up from a specified class of objects, and separate them from a stream of heterogeneous objects, whether they are jumbled in a bin, or are singulated on a motorized or gravity conveyor system; (b) it is able to move the object to arbitrary places within its workspace; (c) it is able to place objects in an outgoing bin or shelf location in its workspace; and, (d) it is able to generate a map of objects that it is able to pick, represented as a candidate set of grasp points in the workcell, and as a list of polytopes enclosing the object in space.

The allowable objects are determined by the capabilities of the robotic system. Their size, weight and geometry are assumed to be such that the robotic system is able to pick, move and place them. These may be any kind of ordered goods, packages, parcels, or other articles that benefit from automated sorting. Each object is associated with a stock keeping unit (SKU), which identifies the item.

The manner in which inbound objects arrive may be for example, in one of two configurations: (a) inbound objects arrive piled in bins of heterogeneous objects; or (b) inbound articles arrive by a moving conveyor. The collection of objects includes some that have exposed bar codes and other objects that do not have exposed bar codes. The robotic system is assumed to be able to pick items from the bin or conveyor. The stream of inbound objects is the sequence of objects as they are unloaded either from the bin or the conveyor.

The manner in which outbound objects are organized is such that objects are placed in a bin, shelf location or cubby, into which all objects corresponding to a given order are consolidated. These outbound destinations may be arranged in vertical arrays, horizontal arrays, grids, or some other regular or irregular manner, but which arrangement is known to the system. The robotic pick and place system is assumed to be able to place objects into all of the outbound destinations, and the correct outbound destination is determined from the SKU of the object.

It is assumed that the objects are marked in one or more places on their exterior with a visually distinctive mark such as a barcode or radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag so that they may be identified with a scanner. The type of marking depends on the type of scanning system used, but may include 1D or 2D barcode symbologies. Multiple symbologies or labeling approaches may be employed. The types of scanners employed are assumed to be compatible with the marking approach. The marking, either by barcode, RFID tag, or other means, encodes a symbol string, which is typically a string of letters and numbers. The symbol string uniquely associates the object with a SKU.

The operations of the systems described above are coordinated by the central control system 20. This system determines from symbol strings the SKU associated with an object, as well as the outbound destination for the object. The central control system is comprised of one or more workstations or central processing units (CPUs). The correspondence between SKUs and outbound destinations is maintained by the central control system in a database called a manifest. The central control system maintains the manifest by communicating with a warehouse management system (WMS).

During operation, the broad flow of work may be generally as follows. First, the system is equipped with a manifest that provides the outbound destination for each inbound object. Next, the system waits for inbound objects to arrive either in a bin or on a conveyor. The robotic system may pick one item at a time from the input bin, and may drop each item into the perception system discussed above. If the perception system successfully recognizes a marking on the object, then the object is then identified and forwarded to a sorting station or other processing station. If the object is not identified, the robotic system may either replace the object back onto the input conveyor and try again, or the conveyor may divert the object to a human sortation bin to be reviewed by a human.

The sequence of locations and orientations of the perception units are chosen so as to minimize the average or maximum amount of time that scanning takes. Again, if the object cannot be identified, the object may be transferred to a special outbound destination for unidentified objects, or it may be returned to the inbound stream. This entire procedure operates in a loop until all of the objects in the inbound set are depleted. The objects in the inbound stream are automatically identified, sorted, and routed to outbound destinations.

In accordance with an embodiment therefore, the invention provides a system for sorting objects that arrive inbound bins and that need to be placed into a shelf of outbound bins, where sorting is to be based on a unique identifier symbol. Key specializations in this embodiment are the specific design of the perception system so as to maximize the probability of a successful scan, while simultaneously minimizing the average scan time. The probability of a successful scan and the average scan time make up key performance characteristics. These key performance characteristics are determined by the configuration and properties of the perception system, as well as the object set and how they are marked.

The two key performance characteristics may be optimized for a given item set and method of barcode labeling. Parameters of the optimization for a barcode system include how many barcode scanners, where and in what orientation to place them, and what sensor resolutions and fields of view for the scanners to use. Optimization can be done through trial and error, or by simulation with models of the object.

Optimization through simulation employs a barcode scanner performance model. A barcode scanner performance model is the range of positions, orientations and barcode element size that a barcode symbol can be detected and decoded by the barcode scanner, where the barcode element size is the size of the smallest feature on the barcode. These are typically rated at a minimum and maximum range, a maximum skew angle, a maximum pitch angle, and a minimum and maximum tilt angle.

Typical performance for camera-based barcode scanners are that they are able to detect barcode symbols within some range of distances as long as both pitch and skew of the plane of the symbol are within the range of plus or minus 45 degrees, while the tilt of the symbol can be arbitrary (between 0 and 360 degrees). The barcode scanner performance model predicts whether a given barcode symbol in a given position and orientation will be detected.

The barcode scanner performance model is coupled with a model of where barcodes would expect to be positioned and oriented. A barcode symbol pose model is the range of all positions and orientations, in other words poses, in which a barcode symbol will expect to be found. For the scanner, the barcode symbol pose model is itself a combination of an article gripping model, which predicts how objects will be held by the robotic system, as well as a barcode-item appearance model, which describes the possible placements of the barcode symbol on the object. For the scanner, the barcode symbol pose model is itself a combination of the barcode-item appearance model, as well as an inbound-object pose model, which models the distribution of poses over which inbound articles are presented to the scanner. These models may be constructed empirically, modeled using an analytical model, or approximate models may be employed using simple sphere models for objects and a uniform distributions over the sphere as a barcode-item appearance model.

FIG. 3 shows a perception system 30 in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention that includes a structure 32 having an opening 34. The structure 32 includes a plurality of rows of sources (e.g., illumination sources such as LEDs) 36 as well as a plurality of image perception units (e.g., cameras) 38. The sources 36 are provided in rows, and each is directed toward the center of the opening. The perception units 38 are also generally directed toward the opening, although, as with the embodiment of FIGS. 1 and 2, some cameras are directed horizontally, while others are directed upward, and some are directed downward. The system 30 also includes an entry source (e.g., infrared source) 40 as well as an entry detector (e.g., infrared detector 42) for detecting when an object has entered the detection system 30.

The LEDs and cameras therefore encircle the inside of the structure 32, and the cameras are positioned to view the interior via windows that may include a glass or plastic covering (e.g., 44). The structure 32 may be suspended by loop hooks 46 or placed over an opening and hang by brackets 48.

FIG. 8 shows a portion of the interior of the scanner 30, where the sections are show laid out linearly. The cameras 38′ each include a camera portion 50 as well as an angled mirror 52 that provides the desired field of view within the structure 32. Similarly, FIGS. 9A-9H diagrammatically and linearly, show the interior of the structure 32 within the scanning region. As soon as the entry detector 40, 42 senses that an item has entered the scanning region, the LEDs and cameras follow a sequence of steps that capture many images. In particular, as shown at 51 in FIG. 9A, a first set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and a first set of cameras 38 are engaged to take a number of pictures (a first set of images) of the interior of the scanner. As shown at 53 in FIG. 9B, a second set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and a second set of cameras 38 (in this case one camera) are engaged to take a number of pictures (a second set of images) of the interior of the scanner. As shown at 54 in FIG. 9C, a third set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and a third set of cameras 38 are engaged to take a number of pictures (a third set of images) of the interior of the scanner As shown at 55 in FIG. 9D, a fourth set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and a fourth set of cameras 38 are engaged to take a number of pictures (a fourth set of images) of the interior of the scanner. As shown at 56 in FIG. 9E, a fifth set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and a fifth set of cameras 38 are engaged to take a number of pictures (a fifth set of images) of the interior of the scanner. As shown at 57 in FIG. 9F, a sixth set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and a sixth set of cameras 38 are engaged to take a number of pictures (a sixth set of images) of the interior of the scanner. As shown at 58 in FIG. 9G, a seventh set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and a seventh set of cameras 38 are engaged to take a number of pictures (a seventh set of images) of the interior of the scanner. As shown at 59 in FIG. 9H, an eighth set of LEDs 36 are illuminated, and an eighth set of cameras 38 are engaged to take a number of pictures (an eighth set of images) of the interior of the scanner. Again, the openings in the structure through which the cameras capture images may include a transparent glass or plastic 44. Each of the rows of LEDs 36 may also include a covering of transparent glass or plastic that is separate from the glass or plastic 44 of the openings to avoid light being transmitted through the glass to any detectors 38. Also, the outside of the structure may be covered (except for the top and bottom openings) with a protective film 33 (e.g., an amber film) as shown in FIG. 5, that filters some of the wavelengths of the LEDs for the protection of any persons in the area.

With further reference to FIGS. 10A-10C, the process begins (step 1000) with the entry detectors 40, 42 detecting whether an object has entered the scanner (step 1002). Once this happens, the first set of lights are turned on and the first set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1004). The first sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A first set of captured images are then sent to a processing core for processing (step 1006). The second set of lights are turned on and the second set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1008). The second sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A second set of captured images are then sent to another processing core for processing (step 1010). The third set of lights are turned on and the third set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1012). The third sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A third set of captured images are then sent to another processing core for processing (step 1014). The fourth set of lights are turned on and the fourth set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1016). The fourth sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A fourth set of captured images are then sent to another processing core for processing (step 1018). The fifth set of lights are turned on and the fifth set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1020). The fifth sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A fifth set of captured images are then sent to another processing core for processing (step 1022). The sixth set of lights are turned on and the sixth set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1024). The sixth sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A sixth set of captured images are then sent to another processing core for processing (step 1026). The seventh set of lights are turned on and the seventh set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1028). The seventh sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A seventh set of captured images are then sent to another processing core for processing (step 1030). The eighth set of lights are turned on and the eighth set of cameras begin capturing images (step 1032). The eighth sets of lights and cameras are then turned off. A eighth set of captured images are then sent to another processing core for processing (step 1034).

The above process may be repeated any number, m, of times (e.g., 50) (step 1036). After all m repeats have finished, the system confirms that the item has exited the scanner (step 1038). The system then determines whether any codes were found (step 1040), and if not reports and error that no codes were found (step 1046). If a codes was found, the system collects all codes found (step 1042) and determines whether all codes match each other (step 1044). If not, the system reports that more than one item was placed in the scanner (step 1050). If all codes found match each other, the system determines whether more than one item was placed in the scanner (step 1048) by determining whether too much space exists between regions of an item. If so, the system reports that more than one item was placed in the scanner (step 1050). If not, the system reports the identification of the code that was found (step 1052) and engages a sorting path associated with the code that was found (step 1054). If no code was found (step 1046) or if the system detects that more than item was in the scanner (step 1050), the system may ask whether the operator wishes to try the scan again (or may be programmed to do so) (step 1056). If yes, then the system returns the item(s) to the input stream ahead of the drop scanner (step 1058). If not, the system moves the item(s) to a manual sort location for sorting by a person (step 1060).

FIG. 11 shows an illustrative diagrammatic view of the control system for the lights in the system of FIG. 3. In particular, a processor 62 is coupled to the structure 32 such that a light controller 66 is directed by a timing unit 60 to provide lighting control signals to a distribution control unit 64 in the structure 32, where the distribution control unit 64 provides individual control to each of the plurality of sets of LEDs 36. As shown in FIG. 11, the processor 62 also includes a camera controller 74 that is coupled to the timing unit 60. The camera controller communicates via core processors 72 to camera controllers 70 on the structure 32, and each camera controller communicates with sets 68 of cameras 38. The controllers 70 control both the triggering of the cameras as well as receive captured image data for processing by each of the respective core processors 72. The results of the core processors 72 are provided to an output identification unit 76.

FIGS. 13A-13R show captured images as well as associated processed image data for nine images during the movement of two items through the drop scanner of FIG. 3. In particular, no items are seen in FIG. 13A, and the associated processing image data shown in FIG. 13B shows no signal. In FIG. 13C, an item appears in the image, and the associated processed image data in FIG. 13D shows the image of the item. As shown in FIG. 13E, a second item appears in the field of view, and the associated processing image data shown in FIG. 13F shows the second item. In this image (as well as in the processed image data of FIGS. 13H and 13J), the system would detect that more than one item has been dropped in the scanner because too much area would appear between the two items. As shown in FIG. 13G, the second item continues to appear in the field of view, and the associated processing image data is shown in FIG. 13H. Similarly, as shown in FIG. 13I, the second item continues to appear in the field of view but begins to move closer to the first item, and the associated processing image data is shown in FIG. 13J. As shown in FIG. 13K, the second item has moved even closer to the first item, and the associated processing image data is shown in FIG. 13L. As shown in FIGS. 13M and 13O, the second item has moved very close to the first item, and the associated processing image data is shown respectively in FIGS. 13N and 13P. FIG. 13Q shows that the items are leaving or have left the scanner, and the associated processing image data is shown in FIG. 13R. The capture of multiple images is therefore important to identifying whether more than one item is presented at one time in the scanner 32.

As discussed above, the output of the processor provides a signal indicative of the identified code of the item in the scanner, and based on this, a sortation system may immediately take action consistent with having the item routed in the desired direction or processing path. For example, FIG. 14 shows a sortation system employing a scanning unit of FIG. 3. Items may be dropped into the scanner by any means, such as but not including a robotic arm 86 (dropping an item 84) or an input conveyor 90 (dropping an item 88). In the case of a robotic arm 86, the end effector may employ deflection sensors 85 for detecting whether the item 84 is moving (e.g., swinging) with respect to the robotic arm 86 (and if so, wait until the movement ceases) prior to dropping the item into the scanner 32.

The scanner 32 is coupled to the processor 62 as discussed above, and an output sortation control signal 63 is provided to a sortation system, such as for example, a controller 96 of a conveyor 94 that provides direction routing of items (e.g., 92) to any of a plurality of bins, containers or locations 98, 104, for example by moving in either direction as indicated at C. Items 100 and 102, for example had been routed to location 98, and item 106 had been routed to location 104.

The system may also include an interrupting system that interrupts the falling of an object through the perception system. The interrupting system may be useful, for example, where the item to be scanned is a plastic bag (either opaque or transparent), and particularly, where the identifier code (such as a barcode) is not visible or readily visible by the perception units, for example if the bag is folded and obscures the barcode. With reference to FIG. 15, in this case, the interrupter element may cause the bag to become flattened by an interrupter plate 120. The interrupter plate 120 may include a further detection unit 124 under a transparent window in the interrupter element 120 to detect identifier indicia that is facing the interrupter element, as well as lights 126 that are illuminated when the detection unit 124 is capturing images as discussed above. The interrupter unit 120 may also be provided on a hinged stand 122 that permits the interrupter element to be moved into or out of the path of an item falling from the scanning unit 32. The interrupter unit 120 may be provided inside of or below the scanning unit 32. Again, the scanner 32 is coupled to the processor 62 as discussed above, and an output sortation control signal is provided to a sortation system, such as for example, a controller of a conveyor 94 that provides direction routing of items (e.g., 92) to any of a plurality of bins, containers or locations 98, 104, for example by moving in either direction as indicated at C.

In other embodiments, the system may include an interrupting element that urges lighter items upward in a reverse direction for a short time. With reference to FIG. 16, in this case, the interrupter element may cause a light bag to be urged upward by a fan 144 attached to a motor 142 that provides upward air pressure through a screen 140. The fan 144 may be provided inside of or below the scanning unit 32. Again, the scanner 32 is coupled to the processor 62 as discussed above, and an output sortation control signal is provided to a sortation system, such as for example, a controller of a conveyor 94 that provides direction routing of items (e.g., 92) to any of a plurality of bins, containers or locations 98, 104, for example by moving in either direction as indicated at C.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that numerous modifications and variations may be made to the above disclosed embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. 

What is claimed is: 1-26. (canceled)
 27. A method of processing objects, said method comprising the steps of: dropping an object into a perception system; providing at least one mirror within the perception system; directing illumination from the object toward the at least one mirror as the object falls through the perception system; reflecting illumination from the object by the at least one mirror toward at least one perception unit; capturing perception data associated with the reflected illumination using the perception unit; and identifying unique indicia on the object responsive to the captured perception data prior to the object falling through the open bottom of the perception system.
 28. The method as claimed in claim 27, wherein the perception unit includes a camera and wherein the perception data includes image data.
 29. The method as claimed in claim 27, wherein the perception unit includes a scanner and the perception data includes scanner data.
 30. The method as claimed in claim 29, wherein the scanner is a radio frequency ID scanner.
 31. The method as claimed in claim 29, wherein the scanner is a barcode scanner.
 32. The method as claimed in claim 31 wherein the scanner is a laser reflectivity scanner.
 33. The method as claimed in claim 26, wherein the processing system further includes a plurality of mirrors, each of which directs illumination toward one or a plurality of perception units.
 34. The method as claimed in claim 33, wherein the processing system further includes a plurality of illumination sources that encircle the perception unit.
 35. The method as claimed in claim 34, wherein the plurality of illumination sources include a plurality of LEDs.
 36. A method of processing objects, said method comprising the steps of: dropping an object into a perception system; directing illumination from the object toward the a first mirror within the perception system as the object falls through the perception system; reflecting illumination from the object by the first mirror toward a first perception unit; capturing perception data associated with the object using the first perception unit; directing illumination from the object toward the a second mirror within the perception system as the object falls through the perception system; reflecting illumination from the object by the second mirror toward a second perception unit; capturing perception data associated with the object using the second perception unit; and identifying unique indicia on the object responsive, at least in part, to the captured first and second perception data.
 37. The method as claimed in claim 36, wherein the captured first perception data is associated with a first portion of a path through which the object falls, and the second perception data is associated with a second portion of the path through which the object falls.
 38. The method as claimed in claim 37, wherein the first portion of the path is proximate an open top of the perception system, and wherein the second portion of the path is proximate an open bottom of the perception system.
 39. The method as claimed in claim 36, wherein each of the first and second perception unit includes a camera and wherein the perception data includes image data.
 40. The method as claimed in claim 36, wherein each of the first and second perception unit includes a scanner and the perception data includes scanner data.
 41. The method as claimed in claim 40, wherein the scanner is a radio frequency ID scanner.
 42. The method as claimed in claim 40, wherein the scanner is a barcode scanner.
 43. The method as claimed in claim 42 wherein the scanner is a laser reflectivity scanner.
 44. The method as claimed in claim 36, wherein the perception system further includes a plurality of illumination sources within the perception system.
 45. The method as claimed in claim 44, wherein the plurality of illumination sources encircle the perception unit.
 46. A drop processing system for processing objects, said drop processing system comprising: an open top through which an object may be dropped into the processing system; at least one upper mirror within the perception system proximate the open top, said at least one upper mirror for directing illumination from the object toward a first perception unit as the object falls through the perception system, said first perception unit for capturing first perception data; an open bottom through which the object may fall from the perception system; at least one lower mirror within the perception system proximate the open bottom, said at least one lower mirror for directing illumination from the object toward a second perception unit as the object falls through the perception system, said second perception unit for capturing second perception data; and identifying means for identifying unique indicia on the object responsive to the captured first perception data and the captured second perception data.
 47. The drop processing system as claimed in claim 46, wherein each of the first and second perception unit includes a camera and wherein the perception data includes image data.
 48. The drop processing system as claimed in claim 46, wherein each of the first and second perception unit includes a scanner and the perception data includes scanner data.
 49. The drop processing system as claimed in claim 48, wherein the scanner is a radio frequency ID scanner.
 50. The drop processing system as claimed in claim 48, wherein the scanner is a barcode scanner.
 51. The drop processing system as claimed in claim 50 wherein the scanner is a laser reflectivity scanner. 